Supernatural: Great character arcs, still sucking at Urban Fantasy.

YAAAAY!!! One more reference to the Fae! Which makes a grand total of two for the whole entire series. Pat yourselves on the backs, writers. You’re branching out!!!

/end of sarcasm/

Seriously, the character arcs in Meta Fiction were great, Dean’s going nuts, and I seriously wanna know if Cas decided to go darkside again or if his actions are being literally controlled by Metatron (which is where my money is). It was great to see Gabriel. 

The overlying plot still blows. I’m still tired and sick to fucking death of angels and demons, and I have been watching a lot of Buffy lately, so seeing UF done well is making SPN look really bland by comparison. 

I would love it if someone explained to me how there have been Griffins in this universe and we’ve never seen one. You know, since they aren’t the most docile of creatures. 

I would really love to see what the old-world Gods think of this Angels on Earth bullshit. But I think that would mean introducing mythologies that don’t coincide with Christianity and actually being respectful of them… The writers of Supernatural are just not that talented. 

All in all, I stay because Cas is either going to get good character development or none at all, and Dean has a 60-40 chance of going apeshit and Sam is completely useless these days and I’d like to see something - anything - happen to him. 

Mostly, I think what Supernatural needs at this point is a good death. Maybe a musical episode and then a good death. 

But yeah, the writers fucking suck. I hate them so much. They took a show with amazing potential and just gutted it. 

avril-lasagne:

letushear:

hoodbypussy:

Évolution inversée

As he got older, his perception of reality became distorted. 

as he became older he got more and more bored with reality. when youre technically perfect the only place you can go is surreal

And here I sit wondering why a man who had that much talent by the time he was 15 would spend his life doing surrealist painting. I’m no artist, but if I could do something that amazing, I wouldn’t spend my life making pictures that looked like they were drawn through a kaleidoscope on crack. 

(via raggedyangelin221b)

schrodingersnerd:

everythingisnightvale:

discontentramblings:

An asexual and pansexual become room-mates and have wacky adventures

The show is called ‘All or Nothing’

Plot twist: the asexual is really super outgoing and is a huge flirt while the pansexual is extremely socially awkward and has trouble ordering coffee let alone getting a date.

image

my hand slipped

OH MY GOD! This speaks to me and my best friend on about a zillion different levels. 

(via theshadowguardian)

glidergirlstoyshop:

gryphknight:

bethelionqueen:

eevee-the-evolutionist:

cosmicallycosmopolitan:

This is making me really sad

Holy shit I didn’t realize there were that few tigers

PROTECT BIG CATS AT ALL COST

I remember seeing a documentary some time ago about declining tiger populations.  Although I can’t remember the name of it (or the network), I did find this link which includes lack of prey animals, shrinking habitats, and extremely compromised genetic diversity among the major causes.

How can people still think that poaching is worth it?! People are ignorant pricks.

glidergirlstoyshop:

gryphknight:

bethelionqueen:

eevee-the-evolutionist:

cosmicallycosmopolitan:

This is making me really sad

Holy shit I didn’t realize there were that few tigers

PROTECT BIG CATS AT ALL COST

I remember seeing a documentary some time ago about declining tiger populations.  Although I can’t remember the name of it (or the network), I did find this link which includes lack of prey animals, shrinking habitats, and extremely compromised genetic diversity among the major causes.

How can people still think that poaching is worth it?! People are ignorant pricks.

(via thats-how-we-roll-in-the-shire)

asker

Anonymous asked: How's the next "What Will Survive Us is Love" chapter going? (kind of dying here)

Ugh, slowly. Moving out of my apartment, so I haven’t had much time to write. Thankfully, today is my day off, so I will have some solid hours to grind it out. Thanks for the nudge, I am so lazy! Lol. I will aim for having the next chapter up by friday or the weekend at latest.

benedict-cumbersomerobes:

On this day (14th of April) in 1912, at 11:41pm the “Unsinkable Ship” collided into an iceberg (after having had 6 iceberg warnings that were ignored), and soon sank, taking over 1,500 lives with it. 705 people escaped on lifeboats, however, there was room for over 400 more.

I completely forgot what day it was. 

benedict-cumbersomerobes:

On this day (14th of April) in 1912, at 11:41pm the “Unsinkable Ship” collided into an iceberg (after having had 6 iceberg warnings that were ignored), and soon sank, taking over 1,500 lives with it. 705 people escaped on lifeboats, however, there was room for over 400 more.

I completely forgot what day it was. 

paxmachina:

The Titanic:
Today 102 years ago the Titanic hit an iceberg at 11:40 pm on its maiden voyage and sank 2 h 40 min later. pic.twitter.com/PFaIz5i3FJ

paxmachina:

The Titanic:

Today 102 years ago the Titanic hit an iceberg at 11:40 pm on its maiden voyage and sank 2 h 40 min later. pic.twitter.com/PFaIz5i3FJ

liarsburninginhell:

So intellectual.
Photo by Ryan Muirhead

liarsburninginhell:

So intellectual.

Photo by Ryan Muirhead

(via ashthesmashole)

endenizecobain:

You dont know what is good if you dont like The Used.

I know what’s good!!!

endenizecobain:

You dont know what is good if you dont like The Used.

I know what’s good!!!

(via ashthesmashole)

sexyasjohnlock:

LET ME TELL YOU A THING ABOUT MARY

SHE KNEW EXACTLY WHAT SHERLOCK’S DEATH DID TO JOHN

SHE WITNESSED FIRSTHAND HOW MUCH IT HURT HIM

AND SHE STILL SHOT AT SHERLOCK

I MEAN SURE SHERLOCK LIVED IN THE END BUT HE DID DIE AND IF HE HADN’T THOUGHT OF JOHN HE WOULD HAVE STAYED DEAD

MARY WOULD DO THAT TO JOHN AGAIN AFTER SEEING HIM BROKEN

AND I CAN NEVER FORGIVE HER FOR THAT

Someone had to say it. I am glad it wasn’t me. 

(via junejuly15)

assbutt-in-the-garrison:

french-techno-robots:

beepish:

mr-cappadocia:

"Had sex with"
"She first slept with"
"would have regular intercourse"
"three counts of sexual intercourse"
A Nation run by Feminists… where a grown woman can fuck an eight year old boy repeatedly and the word “Rape” isn’t mentioned once.
Why? Because thanks to Feminists what she did isn’t considered rape.
And another Woman reaps the benefits of Feminist driven policy. Even if that means she can fuck/molest an eight year old boy repeatedly over the course of two years and get out a year after being sentenced.

this article was written by Kieran Corcoran, a quick google search revealing him to be a man. it was a man who believed that a boy couldn’t be raped by a woman, because a lot of men don’t believe that to be possible.
feminists are trying to work against that notion but it’s hard to do that when you keep blaming them for a thing that is a condition of a patriarchal society.

seriously, believing men can’t be raped is a result of misogynism, because women are “weak” and can’t hurt anyone, it stems from the same place that makes men think it’s cute when a girl’s angry, “Calm down sweetie.” Feminists care about all rape victims, don’t you dare pin this on us.

I am a feminist and I’m here to tell you that any real feminist would never condone this, and would certainly never just call it “sexual intercourse”. This is rape. And 8 year old child cannot consent. Period.

I love how we see an article about how an eight year old boy was violated and raped over the course of two years and instead of giving a shit that this kid’s life has been altered traumatically, the very first thing we see is about how feminists suck. 
This boy is a victim, and this woman should spend the rest of her life behind bars. 

assbutt-in-the-garrison:

french-techno-robots:

beepish:

mr-cappadocia:

"Had sex with"

"She first slept with"

"would have regular intercourse"

"three counts of sexual intercourse"

A Nation run by Feminists… where a grown woman can fuck an eight year old boy repeatedly and the word “Rape” isn’t mentioned once.

Why? Because thanks to Feminists what she did isn’t considered rape.

And another Woman reaps the benefits of Feminist driven policy. Even if that means she can fuck/molest an eight year old boy repeatedly over the course of two years and get out a year after being sentenced.

this article was written by Kieran Corcoran, a quick google search revealing him to be a man. it was a man who believed that a boy couldn’t be raped by a woman, because a lot of men don’t believe that to be possible.

feminists are trying to work against that notion but it’s hard to do that when you keep blaming them for a thing that is a condition of a patriarchal society.

seriously, believing men can’t be raped is a result of misogynism, because women are “weak” and can’t hurt anyone, it stems from the same place that makes men think it’s cute when a girl’s angry, “Calm down sweetie.” Feminists care about all rape victims, don’t you dare pin this on us.

I am a feminist and I’m here to tell you that any real feminist would never condone this, and would certainly never just call it “sexual intercourse”. This is rape. And 8 year old child cannot consent. Period.

I love how we see an article about how an eight year old boy was violated and raped over the course of two years and instead of giving a shit that this kid’s life has been altered traumatically, the very first thing we see is about how feminists suck. 

This boy is a victim, and this woman should spend the rest of her life behind bars. 

(via remeanie)